|
|
By
David Mansfield, MD
President, Texas Society of Sports Medicine
I
recently attended an industry sponsored event on Health
Information Technology (HIT) and the Electronic Health Record
(EHR).
The electronic health record refers to the ultimate
goal of HIT, where a patients entire health history,
treatments, prescriptions, etcetera will be available in a
single accessible electronic file. Many of the
|
|
discussions
were specific to the company’s product, but there were also
several informational discussions and lectures on the future
of health technology.
The speakers included the leading professionals of HIT
at Microsoft, Intel, and Misys, in addition to public policy
advisers to the Department of Health and Human Services.
While the opinions varied on the method of
implementation, the opinion was unified that EHR is eminent
and that within about five years will be government mandated.
While
the process will certainly be a long and arduous one, the
final product will be one which will benefit both physician
and patient.
No one can argue that patient safety will be improved
by the elimination of common human errors, such as incorrect
medication administration due to handwriting errors, but the
process of moving to a completely electronic health record
will have errors and problems of its own.
Because the shift to EHR will require a redirection of
work flow in the office setting, errors will no doubt be made
as health care providers and staff will placed in new roles.
The good news is that many of the common computer
errors, such a mis-key errors, will be identified and
corrected almost immediately, usually before the patient has
left the office.
Orthopedic
surgeons are often at the forefront of technology development
and implementation.
The astounding technical developments in arthroscopy
and computer aided surgery surely support this opinion.
This willingness to embrace and use new technology will
be of great benefit in the transition to a paperless
environment.
Many young surgeons coming out of training are already
familiar with electronic medical records (EMR), and many older
surgeons are currently installing an EMR system in their
offices.
The EMR is a vital component of the EHR and represents
what would be traditionally referred to as the patient chart.
Despite
this, there will be surgeons that oppose EMR because they say
it makes them less productive, it takes too much time to
generate notes that are too impersonal or that they are simply
too old to learn a new system of charting.
While there can be no doubt that during the
implantation of EMR, the surgeon will have to reduce his
workload as every patient must be entered as new patient into
the EMR system, studies have shown that the computer will
provide more accurate encounter coding, and thus improve
collections on the documented encounters. As one becomes more
familiar with an EMR system, templates can be customized,
redundancies deleted, and positions of vital pieces of the EMR
known.
Ultimately, this should lead to shorter charting times
and increased efficiency.
Customizing templates, as well as the use of speech
recognition technology and free text entry can be used to
personalize notes or fill in the gaps wherever the electronic
medical record falls short.
To
make this transition to EMR as painless as possible several
pieces of advice have been offered.
First, choose a company carefully - there are many
companies out there offering programs which may or may not be
obsolete in the coming years.
The ability to seamlessly integrate into a practice’s
existing billing and scheduling system should be an important
consideration in the final determination of provider.
While there is no doubt that different versions of the
EMR program and updates are inevitable, it is important to try
to ensure that these program upgrades do not bring about
unforeseen “crashes” in the business office.
Next make sure that the company is dedicated to support
and customer service.
The implementation of an EMR system will be trying
enough without the added stress of “flying solo” and
attempting to figure out the nuances of a charting system.
Finally, if you are a member of a group, there should
be one to three “champions” of EMR.
These are partners who will act as both cheerleaders
for EMR, as well as a sounding board for the complaints and
concerns of frustrated partners making the transition to a
paperless world.
Ideally,
when fully implemented, EMR will provide the physician with
the ability to order tests, update demographic information,
write prescriptions and have them sent to the pharmacy, and
schedule procedures before the patient leaves the room
Additionally, the EMR will possibly allow the access to
patient records to approved providers on a 24 hour a day
basis.
The patient’s exact history will be easily obtained,
allowing the on call physician to make more educated decisions
without having to rely solely on the recollections of the
patient as to what they are being treated for and what
procedures they may have had.
I
am currently beginning to implement EMR in my office, and then
I have to try to integrate twenty plus partners into our EMR
system.
While I do get discouraged at times, the obvious
benefits of EMR keep me trying.
Wish me luck (I need it!), and I’ll let you know how
it goes.
Click
here to view
more articles in the October 2006 TSSM Newsletter.
[top]
[back
to e-card archive page]
|