March 30, 2009

 

 
TMA Physicians and Legislators: "Patients Have a Right to Know"
  

The Texas Medical Association (TMA) joined with state legislators to launch initiatives today that would make using health insurance better and much easier for Texas patients.

 

The problem: Too often patients do not understand their health

insurance information and cannot easily find the answers.

"We believe our patients have the right to know what's covered in their insurance," said Josie R. Williams, MD, TMA's president. "Our patients also have the right to know which doctors and hospitals are in their network, how much extra they will have to pay for the health care services they receive, and why they have to keep paying more for health insurance."

That is why TMA launched its grassroots outreach campaign, Patients' Right to Know. The goal of the campaign is to engage Texas patients in the effort to pass legislation that would reform health insurance.

Several state lawmakers have introduced important legislation that will ensure that patients have the right to accurate and current information on copays, deductibles, and health plan networks to make good health care decisions.

Health Insurance Code of Conduct Act of 2009

The first piece of legislation to bring needed improvements to the health insurance industry is the Health Insurance Code of Conduct Act of 2009. The measure was filed by Sen. Kip Averitt (R-Waco) and Rep. Craig Eiland (D-Galveston) in the Senate and the House as Senate Bill 1257 and House Bill 2750, respectively.  

The Health Insurance Code of Conduct Act of 2009 would:

·         Require health plans to receive input from an outside party before they could cancel the insurance of a very ill or injured patient who starts to run up high medical bills;

·         Prevent health plans from increasing the cost of insurance for no reason;

·         Help patients and employers determine how much of their money the insurance companies actually spend on health care, vs. advertising or big bonuses, or profits;

·         Prevent health insurance companies from selling doctors' contracts behind their backs (they're fooling the doctors and making patients pay for it); and

·         Make health insurance companies stop trying to tell patients that some doctors are better than others based on the insurance claims. That's like saying a restaurant's food is good or bad just by looking at the bill at the end of the meal.


"We think it's about time health insurance companies treated our patients like valued customers, and keep the promises they make," added Dr. Williams.

Health Insurance "Soup Can Label" Bill

For many people, understanding which insurance to buy is difficult. So physicians wonder, what if patients could understand what's in their health insurance policy as easily as they can see what's in a can of soup? What if patients could compare two different health plans as easily as they can compare the calories in two different jars of peanut butter?

TMA's health insurance label plan, filed by Sen. Kirk Watson (D-Austin) and Rep. Senfronia Thompson (D-Houston), would do just that. SB 815 and HB 1932 would require a standardized format for health plan marketing materials that allows an "apples-to-apples" comparison of health insurance coverage.

"Buying health insurance today is very complicated," said Dr. Williams. She added that big insurance companies offer dozens of different plans, and cover different things. Patients' out-of-pocket costs can vary wildly. "It is almost impossible to compare what each plan might mean to patients, their family, or business owners' employees, and we think it's time big insurance makes this simpler for patients."

The Patients' Right to Know campaign calls on patients and physicians to help make health insurance more accessible and transparent. Among other tools, TMA created www.meandmydoctor.com, a Web site with a grassroots action center where patients can write their legislators in support of health insurance reform bills. Educational materials will be displayed in physician offices to inform and engage patients.

Other health insurance reform bills being filed:

·         Sen. Wendy Davis (D-Fort Worth) filed SB 1611, which would prohibit insurers from arbitrarily revoking a patient's health insurance coverage. The companion legislation to SB 1611 is HB 1748 by Rep. Todd Smith (R-Euless). Senator Davis also filed three bills that would require health insurers to disclose how they spend the patient's premium dollar. Those bills are SBs 1155, 1156, and 1158.

·         Rep. Carol Alvarado (D-Houston) filed HB 3120, relating to the maximum allowable premium rate increase for small-employer health benefit plans.

·         HB 223 by Representative Eiland and SB 714 by Sen. Leticia Van de Putte (D-San Antonio) would regulate how a physician's contract information is sold, leased, or shared among health insurance companies.

·         HB 1392 by Rep. David Leibowitz (D-San Antonio) and SB 1396 by Sen. Robert Deuell, MD (R- Greenville), would require health insurance companies to use scientifically valid criteria to evaluate physicians' performance and disclose those criteria in advance.

·         HBs 1369 and 1370 by Rep. Eddie Rodriguez (D-Austin) would provide transparency about how insurers calculate patients' coinsurance, and allow patients to accurately predict their out-of-pocket costs.

·         SB 901 by Senator Deuell, MD, relates to the collection of information concerning data mining and pattern recognition by health plan benefit insurers, and gives the Texas Department of Insurance the authority to require health plans to report how they use this information.

·         HB 389 by Rep. John Zerwas, MD (R-Simonton), clarifies requirements for expedited credentialing of physicians by health plans.

·         HB 390 by Representative Zerwas, MD, and SB 39 by Sen. Judith Zaffirini (D-Laredo) would require health plans to pay patients' routine medical costs when participating in a clinical trial.

·         HB 1342 by Rep. Jose Menendez (D-San Antonio) and SB 863 by Sen. Chris Harris (R-Arlington) require health plans to provide pertinent patient coverage information at the time of service.

TMA is the largest state medical society in the nation, representing nearly 44,000 physician and medical student members. It is located in Austin and has 120 component county medical societies around the state. TMA's key objective since 1853 is to improve the health of all Texans.

Contact: 
Pam Udall (512) 370-1382; cell: (512) 413-6807;
e-mail:
pam.udall@texmed.org

Brent Annear (512) 370-1381; cell: (512) 656-7320;
e-mail: brent.annear@texmed.org
[top] [back to e-card archive page]

  

  

Texas District By District: Judith Zaffirini
 
  

Senator Judith Zaffirini (D-Laredo) represents the 21st Senatorial District. The second highest-ranking Texas state senator, she also is the highest-ranking woman and Hispanic senator and the highest-ranking senator for Bexar County and the border region. In 2008 she was re-elected in a seventh landslide victory with 79 percent in the primary and 68 percent in the general election. She has carried all 17 counties in the large and diverse district in every re-election, something no one else ever has accomplished.

Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst appointed her (2009) Chair of the Senate Higher Education Committee and member of the Senate Finance, Health and Human Services, Economic Development, and Administration committees. She is the first Hispanic woman senator in Texas to serve as President Pro Tempore of the Texas Senate and as Governor for a Day. She has served three consecutive terms as Chair of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, seven terms on the Appropriations Conference Committee, eight terms on the Senate Finance Committee, ten terms on the Senate Education Committee and on the Legislative Budget Board since 2004.

Senator Zaffirini's legendary work ethic is reflected in her 100 percent perfect attendance record in the Texas Senate since 1987, except for breaking quorum deliberately to prevent an untimely re-redistricting that the U.S. Supreme Court (2006) ruled violated the Voting Rights Act and disenfranchised voters in SD 21. Continuing her unique career-long 100 percent voting record, Senator Zaffirini cast her 38,530th consecutive vote in 2007. She has sponsored and passed 581 bills and 51 substantive resolutions and co-sponsored and passed another 278 bills. Her legislative priorities include improving public education, higher education, and health and human services.

Senator Zaffirini has received more than 600 awards and honors for her legislative, public service, and professional work, including more than 100 in communications. Her 2008 awards include being named one of the "100 Most Influential Hispanics" by Hispanic Business magazine; "30 Stars Over Texas," Texas Council on Family Violence; Wind Champion, Wind Coalition; La Madrina de Region Central Del Rio Bravo, Middle Rio Grande Development Council; Outstanding Legislator and Alpha Doe, Texas Deer Association; The Best of the Texas Senate, Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT); Long Term Care Champion, Texas Health Care Association; Early Care and Education Champion, Texas Licensed Health Care Association; and Seρora Internacional by the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). Interestingly, she was named "Sister Judith," an Honorary Nun, by the Sisters of Mercy and Mercy Industries, and "Mr. South Texas" by the Washington's Birthday Celebration Association.

Additionally, in 2008 Senator Zaffirini received eight awards from the Press Women of Texas Association, who have recognized her communications expertise repeatedly with national and statewide awards for her publications, speeches, and public relations campaigns, including annual statewide first-place awards; and two Best in Texas Merit Awards from the Texas Public Relations Association, who earlier awarded her Best of Texas Awards for her Governor for a Day event and her first edition of 20 Dozen Tips for Better Communication and Leadership Skills.

Dr. Zaffirini is an award-winning communication specialist with 13 years of teaching experience, including at the college and university levels. The South Texas Press Association honored her for her distinguished career in journalism and public service. Through her business, Zaffirini Communications, she provides professional communication services, including consulting, workshops and seminars, one-on-one coaching, keynote addresses, and writing. A distinguished communicator, educator, and leader, she holds B.S., M.A., and PhD degrees from The University of Texas at Austin, each with a 3.9 grade-point average.

A lector at Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church and member of the Texas Philosophical Society and of Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society, her professional memberships include the Texas Press Women, Texas Public Relations Association, International Communication Association, Speech Communication Association, and Association for Borderlands Studies. Judith and Carlos Zaffirini have been married for 44 years. Their son, Carlos Jr., is a graduate of the UT McCombs School of Business and the UT School of Law.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]

  

  

This Week In Texas: Mignon McGarry Memos

By Mignon McGarry
TOA Legislative Advocate
TOA Online Version: All Memos

 

March 25, 2009, Wednesday

It is common for many insiders in Austin to say that the only bill that the Texas Legislature must pass each session is the budget.  Budgets

are difficult to pass when times are tough and equally tough to pass in times of plenty as legislators fight over competing priorities.

Rumor has it that the House Appropriations Committee is scheduled to wrap up their work on the House version of the budget this weekend.  If things go according to schedule, the full House will then take up its version of the budget sometime during the week after Easter – between April 13-17.  The Senate Finance Committee has wrapped up its budget work and plans to vote on the bill as soon as Monday.  That means the full Senate should see the budget on the Senate floor possibly next Thursday, April 2nd.  The Senate budget is said to spend roughly $177 billion but it does not spend any funds from the Economic Stabilization Fund, also known as the Rainy Day Fund.  Senate tradition dictates that members will discuss the budget for several hours but will offer no amendments on the Senate floor.  The House follows no such tradition and generally requires members to "pre-file" amendments so that their fiscal impact can be determined and copies distributed to all members prior to the day's debate.

If you are interested in more details about the state's budget, the House Research Organization has published a report entitled Fiscal 2010-11 State Budget: Background on the Issues which provides additional background information regarding major budget drivers.  Click here to view the report.

Rep. Todd Smith (R-Euless), chair of the House Elections Committee, announced that his committee will devote two days of hearings to the controversial Voter ID legislation on April 6 and 7. The first day will be devoted to expert testimony, with an equal number of people for and against the bill invited. The second day will be for public testimony.
[top] [back to e-card archive page]

 

     

David Teuscher, MD Testifies Before Senator And Senate Republican Conference
 

David Teuscher, MD, Beaumont orthopaedic surgeon testified before Senator Cornyn and the Senate Republican Conference March 16th. The SRC held a hearing on tort reform and Dr. Teuscher was asked to testify regarding the positive effects of medical liability reform in Texas and on patients' access to healthcare.

These proceedings can be watched by clicking here. Simply click on the Flash logo to watch it streaming online.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]
  

 
Radiologists, Physicians Argue Over Diagnostic Imaging Legislation
  

By Bill Kidd
WorkCompCentral

A coalition of business interests, insurers and radiologists wants Texas lawmakers to approve legislation they argue is needed to regulate diagnostic imaging to help control medical costs and improve patient safety by preventing overuse of the technology.

But the Texas Medical Association argues the proposals aren't needed and could add to the burden of doctors and patients – and are prompted by radiologists' financial interests.

The increasing use of diagnostic imaging – and the accompanying costs – has raised nationwide concern in recent years, along with worries that patients are being exposed to unnecessarily high doses of radiation.

While there is no dispute that such diagnostic tests are needed in many cases and may prevent patients from having to undergo exploratory surgery, critics fear that some doctors are overusing them.

The Government Accountability Office reports that the amount of money that Medicare spent on medical imaging doubled during the period from 2000 to 2006 to approximately $14 billion.

According to a New York Times story published March 2, more than 95 million such tests are performed annually in the United States, at cost of $100 billion.

The story also reported that recent studies show between 20% and 50% of the procedures should not have been done, because the results didn't assist in diagnosing ailments or treating patients.

And the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement has announced that Americans are exposed to seven times more radiation from medical imaging tests than they were in 1980.

The Coalition for Ethical Imaging, which is pushing for adoption of the bills pending in the Texas Legislature, is comprised of the Texas Association of Business, Texas Association of Health Plans, Texas Radiological Society and other groups of Texans who work in the field of radiology.

The coalition reports it represents nearly 23,000 Texans and more than 120,000 Texas businesses.

The group supports Senate Bill 1461 by Sen. Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock, and its companion bill in the House of Representatives, House Bill 2599 by Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston.

Those bills require registration of diagnostic imaging equipment and accreditation of diagnostic imaging facilities.

The measures also would address quality issues associated with diagnostic imaging providers and attempt to determine the extent to which physician ownership of advanced diagnostic imaging equipment influences the decision to prescribe expensive tests.

In addition, the coalition supports HB 2279 by Thompson, which addresses billing practices related to diagnostic imaging, and SB 821 by Sen. Florence Shapiro, R-Plano, which addresses minimum standards for radiologist assistants.

Dr. Richard Strax [TMA member], Houston, president of the Texas Radiological Society, told WorkCompCentral Wednesday that Texas is "behind the curve nationally in providing basic safeguards that ensure that advanced diagnostic services are utilized appropriately."

The proposed legislation would make "a tremendous difference in quality of patient care," Strax said.

The coalition reports the legislation "addresses four areas of concern that significantly impact patient safety and rising health care costs," including:

  • Over-utilization of diagnostic imaging.

  • Inadequate accreditation of scanning facilities and registration of equipment.

  • Insufficient disclosure to patients when a physician has a financial interest in the imaging equipment or facility to which they refer patients.

  • Nontransparent billing practices.

The group is focusing its efforts on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET).

The coalition reports the bills would:

  • Improve patient safety and ensure "quality, consistency and accuracy" through an accreditation and registration system that would require that radiology facilities and equipment meet basic quality requirements and use nationally accepted criteria to ensure patient safety.

  • Require a study by the Department of State Health Services to compare the rates at which diagnostic imaging services are prescribed by physicians who have a financial interest in imaging equipment compared with physicians of the same specialty who have no financial interest in such equipment, using information from electronic forms already generated by imaging centers and physician's offices.

  • Require physicians to disclose to patients that they have a financial interest in the imaging centers or equipment to which they are referring patients.

  • Require transparency in diagnostic imaging billing practices to ensure that patients know the breakdown of the costs, if services were "marked up" and if a trained radiologist performed the service.

The proposed legislation would not restrict physician ownership of diagnostic imaging machines or equipment; affect X-rays, mammograms, ultrasounds or other common tests frequently conducted at physicians' offices; or create any "costly or administratively burdensome and onerous" tasks for physicians, the coalition contends.

Strax reported that diagnostic imaging costs "have become the fastest increasing segment of our health care budget," and that the coalition wants to assure that the money is being spent properly – and that the public is being protected.

The legislation "is intended to get a handle on where the machines are and who owns them," and to require minimum standards for performance for diagnostic imaging tests as has been done by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the case of mammograms, Strax said. CMS is expected to enact similar standards for diagnostic imaging, he added.

"Radiologists won't profit from this," Strax reported. Radiologists probably already are reading results from doctor-owned machines, he commented.

Austin physician Dr. Albert Gros, chairman of the Texas Medical Association's council on legislation, told WorkCompCentral the association believes "the magnitude of the problems" being cited by the coalition are "greatly exaggerated."

"We've been talking with those guys for a couple of years," Gros said. He labeled the effort "somewhat disingenuous" on the part of the radiologists, saying their concerns may be financial.

The legislation targets MRI, PET and CT procedures but "not the lower-cost procedures" such as mammograms and sonograms, Gros commented.

Gros said the legislation would "create a lot of administrative hurdles for physicians" and make it more difficult for them to treat patients efficiently.

Many orthopedic practices have MRI machines which enable orthopedists to examine patients and interpret results "in real time," Gros commented. The orthopedists are qualified to read and interpret the results, and patients aren't required to go to another site for the tests, Gros said.

Disclosing whether the practice owns the machine could be handled by posting a sign – and requiring such a sign could be done by an agency rule without the need for legislation, he said. 

Dr. Cynthia Sherry [TMA member], past president of the Texas Radiology Society and chairwoman of the radiology department at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas, disagrees that financial interests are the motivation for radiologists.

"Financially, we could lose or it could be a wash," Sherry said.

"The basic drive here is that we're concerned about patient safety and quality when it comes to imaging," Sherry reported. "We think if there were more regulations on appropriate utilization and safety standards, all patients would be better off ... and the economic burden would improve."

Sherry said "some of the boom" in diagnostic imaging use may be due to physician ownership of the imaging equipment and that a study could help resolve that question.

Sherry acknowledges that the radiologists and the Texas Medical Association "don't see eye to eye on this particular issue. … This is one we disagree with them on."

To reach additional information and the text of the bills, click here and type in the bill number.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]

  

  

TOA Legislative Update
 

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
House Bill 2599 by Rep. Senfronia Thompson and its companion Senate Bill 1461 by Sen. Robert Duncan would require the registration of diagnostic imaging equipment and accreditation of diagnostic imaging facilities. The legislation would require physicians to disclose to patients that they have a financial interest in the imaging centers/equipment to which they are referring.

This legislation is backed by a group known as the Coalition for Ethical Imaging whose primary supporter is the Texas Radiological Society.  Several physician groups have formed Imaging Allicance.org to advocate on behalf of access to quality medical imaging.
 
DIRECT ACCESS TO PHYSICAL THERAPY
Senate Bill 433 by Sen. John Carona and its companion House Bill 607 by Rep. David Farabee would allow the general public some degree of direct access to physical therapists.  Representatives of TOA along with TMA have been working with Senator Carona and Representative Farabee to determine is any type of agreed to legislation can be developed.  No hearings have been held as of yet but we expect both of these bills to be heard in a committee hearing since both legislators are committed to passing some type of legislation on this subject.
 
PODIATRISTS
House Bill 1570 by Rep. Senfronia Thompson and its companion Senate Bill 1751 by Sen. Mike Jackson address the reimbursement under preferred provider benefit plans for services provided by licensed podiatrists.  The legislation requires that the methodology used to compute the amount of payment or reimbursement for services or procedures covered by the preferred provider contract is the same as the methodology used to compute the amount of payment or reimbursement when the services or procedures are provided by a physician.
 
SILENT PPOs
House Bill 223 by Rep. Craig Eiland and its companion SB 714 by Sen. Leticia Van de Putte would regulate entities acting as contracting agents in the secondary market for certain physician discounts.  House Bill 223 was discussed in the House Insurance Committee and is currently pending in that committee.
 
SMALL BUSINESS EXEMPTION – FRANCHISE TAX
Several bills have been filed this session to increase the small business exemption under the Texas franchise or margins tax from the current $300,000 to $1 million.  We expect this to be the only change to the franchise tax that receives serious consideration by the Legislature even though the fiscal cost of such a change would be substantial.  Once the primary "vehicle" for this change has been identified, we will follow it closely as it could impact some smaller medical practices.

STANDARD OF PROOF IN EMERGENCY CARE SITUATIONS
Senate Bill 152 by Sen. Rodney Ellis would eliminate the willful and wanton standard of negligence for health care liability claims arising out of the provision of emergency medical care by individuals or entities who are regularly in the business of providing emergency care.  For all other physicians and providers, Senate Bill 152 changes the liability standard to willful or wanton instead of willful and wanton.  There is no companion bill in the House.  Senate Bill 152 will be discussed in the Senate State Affairs Committee on Thursday, March 26th.
 
 
TEXAS DEPT. OF INSURANCE SUNSET BILL
Senate Bill 1007 by Sen. Glen Hegar and its companion House Bill  2203 by Rep. Carl Isett address the sunset provisions for the Texas Department of Insurance.  Since the Sunset review of the Division of Workers' Compensation was postponed until 2011, this legislation does not address that division.
           
WORKERS COMPENSATION
49 bills addressing various components of the workers' compensation system have been filed.  The following bills deal specifically with medical care associated with a workers' compensation claim:        

HB 698 by Rep. John Zerwas/ SB 378 by Sen. Leticia Van de Putte Relating to the designated doctor's examination under the workers' compensation system.

HB 1166 by Rep. David  Leibowitz Relating to certain requirements for doctors providing professional services under the workers' compensation system.

HB 2428 by  Rep. Joe Deshotel Relating to immunity from liability for doctors performing certain medical services at the request of the Division of Workers' Compensation.

HB 3625 by  Rep. Gary Elkins  Relating to deadlines regarding certain preauthorization requests affecting workers' compensation health care networks.

HB 3821 by Rep. David Leibowitz Relating to waiver of an insurer's right to contest compensability of certain workers' compensation claims.

HB 3822 by Rep. David Leibowitz Relating to review of the medical necessity of certain health care provided in connection with a workers' compensation claim.

HB 3823 by  Rep. David Leibowitz Relating to certifications of maximum medical improvement and assignments of impairment ratings under the workers' compensation system.

HB 4624 by Rep. Eddie Lucio III Relating to certain requirements for doctors providing professional services under the workers' compensation system.

SB 1696 by Sen. Steve Ogden Relating to workers' compensation compensability disputes, examinations to define the compensable injury and notifications to health care providers regarding compensability disputes.

SB 1815 by Sen. Leticia Van de Putte  Relating to immunity from liability for doctors performing certain services at the request of the division of workers' compensation of the Texas Department of Insurance.

SB 1985  by Sen. Carlos Uresti  Relating to workers' compensation health care reimbursement policies and fee guidelines for certain health care services.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]


You have subscribed to this newsletter.  If your contact information has changed, please update your account.  Thank you!