|
|
|
|
|
|
Ballots - AAOS
Nominations Committee
|
|
By John Early, MD
President, Texas Orthopaedic Association
Several years ago, the AAOS Board of Directors found it
necessary to limit the number of terms a fellow could
serve on the Nominating Committee. This was necessary
because although there are over 16,000 eligible
candidates in the Academy, only a relatively small pool
of candidates continued to be elected to this powerful
committee. Since
|
|
|
each voter is
unable to properly vet each candidate, this modification brought
about little change in the composition of the Nominating Committee
since votes are cast mainly based on name recognition which occurs
predominantly through publications and lectures. While we believe
that AAOS Fellows who publish and lecture extensively should have a
voice, the election process has imposed a significant handicap on
those leaders who are well known and recognized in their respective
States, but not necessarily on the national stage because their
career paths do not bring them national attention. These state and
regional leaders have demonstrated excellent leadership in their
societies and would bring an additional dimension to the table.
We believe that
the large numbers of AAOS fellows that these state and regional
leaders stand for have been under-represented in selecting the
future leaders of our Academy.
We have carefully
evaluated the candidates for the AAOS 2009-2010 Nominating Committee
and have selected the following physicians as worthy of your
consideration and your vote:
Dwight Burney, III, M.D. from New Mexico
John T.
Gill, M.D. from Texas
Stuart Hirsch, M.D. from New Jersey
Douglas Jackson, M.D. from California
Richard F. Santore, M.D. from California
Edward
A.Toriello, M.D. from New York
[top]
[back
to e-card archive page]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The DWC-TDI Is
Undertaking A Review Of Peer Review Physicians And Insurance
Carriers
|
|
The DWC (Division of Workman
Compensation) of the TDI (Texas Department of Insurance) is
undertaking a review of peer review physicians and insurance
carriers. Dr. Howard Smith (Medical Director) of the DWC wants to be
advised of each problem that is experienced with peer review
physician, Designated Doctors (DD), or insurance carriers under the
peer review process. |
|
This COMPLAINT LETTER should be
directed to DWC by email or fax
Name of patient
1. Birth date of patient
2. Name of Insurance carrier
3. DWC # if known
4. Name of peer review physician and number you called
5. Date and time of when phone call(s) received and date and time
you responded
6. The exact problem that you experienced
Types of problems:
-
Too little time to respond to a phone
call
-
No one answers the number you are
instructed to call or it is answered by voice mail instead of a
person
-
If you left a message for call back
and no one calls you back
-
The peer review physician does not
have all the medical records that you have already sent to the
carrier
-
The peer reviewer is not of the same
school. e.g. MD to MD, podiatrist to podiatrist
-
If the peer review physician did not
understand the complexity of the case such as a psychiatrist
reviewing a request for a complex hand surgery ( a peer review
physician is not suppose to accept a case where that physician does
not have the expertise to make an appropriate medical decision)
-
A peer review physician can and should
make mutual decisions with the treating/requesting physician and is
not suppose to only deny or approve the exact request. e.g. If
request is for 10 physical therapy treatments, you can mutually
agree to 6
-
A peer review physician can make a
decision on the medical necessity of a procedure but does not make
decisions on compensability
-
A peer review physician can make a
decision on the medical necessity of a surgical procedure but should
not dictate exactly what can or cannot be done during the procedure
[top]
[back
to e-card archive page]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Week In Texas: Mignon
McGarry Memos
|
|
By Mignon McGarry
TOA Legislative Advocate
TOA Online Version: All Memos
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
The First Called Special Session of the 81st
Legislature began this morning at 10:00am in Austin. As of
now, there are only three issues
|
|
eligible for consideration
based on Governor Perry’s proclamation calling the special
session. Those issues include legislation extending the
existence the Texas Department of Transportation, Texas
Department of Insurance, Texas Racing Commission, Office of
Public Insurance Counsel and Texas State Affordable Housing
Corporation; legislation allowing the Texas Department of
Transportation to issue general obligation bonds for highway
improvement projects, and for the creation, administration,
financing and use of a Texas Transportation Revolving Fund
to provide financial assistance for transportation projects;
and legislation extending the authority of the Texas
Department of Transportation and a regional mobility
authority to use comprehensive development agreements to
design, finance, build and maintain transportation
infrastructure.
The House convened and quickly referred bills covering the three
issues to standing committees for hearings to take place today. The
House committees are expected to vote out these bills to enable the
full House to consider them as early as tomorrow.
Rep. Frank Corte (R-San
Antonio) is currently on reserve duty so his wife Valerie Corte was
sworn in as his temporary replacement.
The Senate took similar action, referring bills covering the issues
on the Governor’s call to the Senate Finance Committee. The Senate
Finance Committee will meet today to take up the bills on the call.
The Senate will reconvene at 3:00pm this afternoon to take up the
bills on the floor.
If all goes as expected, the special
session could conclude as early as this Friday.
[top]
[back
to e-card archive page]
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Town Hall Meeting With Representative Steny
Hoyer and Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson
|
|
The TOA was well
represented by Dr. Andy Kant and Dr. John Gill at a recent Town Hall
Meeting with Representative Hoyer who is the Majority Leader in the
House of Representatives and Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson
from the 30th District in Dallas, Texas. The meeting was
regarding healthcare. Representative Hoyer indicated that there
would be committee hearings and markups of a planned draft bill of
healthcare reform beginning around July 12th. The plan is
to spend |
|
approximately
one month on
hearings and markups and have a bill on the floor for a vote soon.
Comments by
Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson related the problems that many of
her constituents in South Dallas have in obtaining affordable, effective
healthcare. Even those patients who are under Medicaid and S-CHIP often
cannot find physicians to treat them. There were representatives from
Parkland Hospital, UT Hospital System, Methodist Hospital System and the
Baylor System, as well as the Children's Hospital in Dallas discussing
the problems of access to medical care. The CEOs of various hospital
systems were very supportive that their physician-hospital joint venture
relationships which resulted in better, more efficient care for their
patients.
Congressman Hoyer
stated emphatically that the new healthcare plan would have choice of
hospitals, choice of insurance and choice of doctors. He stated that
Congress is looking for a healthcare reform that is more economical and
provides not only better coverage and care, but access to care. He
discussed the manpower shortage of physicians. Graduate medical
education and funding for residency programs were discussed. Congressman
Hoyer emphasized a plan to use foreign medical graduates and allied
health professionals to fill in the gap where there were not sufficient
physicians.
Congresswoman Eddie
Bernice Johnson, who was a head psychiatric nurse at the VA before
becoming a congresswoman, fully understands the problems of medical care
and access to that care. She has joint venture specialty hospitals in
her district.
It is very important
for you to fax or call your Congressman, as well as Congresswoman Eddie
Bernice Johnson and Congressman Steny Hoyer your concerns about
healthcare reform. Both Dr. Gill and Dr. Kant are concerned that there
has not been sufficient attention paid to the funding of residency
programs, the expansion of residency programs, and the manpower shortage
of physicians. We are also concerned that the draft legislation contains
restrictions on physician ownership when statistics clearly demonstrate
that physician owned hospitals are efficient, economical, employ many
people, have low infection rates, and high patient satisfaction rates
and are top rated hospitals in Texas and the nation.
The CEOs of the
hospitals and hospital systems as well as the physicians present
emphasized that one of the major problems that physicians are
experiencing is the inability to cover their costs of continuing to
provide medical care in the present economic climate. All agree that
physicians need to be adequately reimbursed.
Quotes
-
Affordable quality healthcare for
every American.
-
Getting the treatment you need when
you need it.
-
Delaying a doctor visit or test equals
delay in treatment.
-
Not all patients fit within the
guideline. Care must be individualized to the patient and the
disease.
-
Healthcare is a personal issue, not
only an economic issue.
-
Science and research should enhance
and improve healthcare, not limit choices.
Things not discussed
-
Why are there so few private
physicians not associated with academic centers or large healthcare
institutions on the various healthcare reform committees?
-
Family physicians are not omnipotent.
They cannot possibly know everything. The gatekeeper theory did not
work in the past and it will not work in the future.
-
Physician joint venture specialty
hospitals are more economical, give higher satisfaction rates, have
lower infection rates, and have shorter hospital stays.
-
Large hospital complexes and
corporations both for-profit and not-for-profit still deal with
corporate profits as the bottom line.
-
There is no savings in stopping
physician investment in joint ventures for hospital ownership. Cases
will continue to be done at other institutions that are probably
more expensive. Only about 50% of the healthcare premium received by
insurance companies actually is paid out for patient care.
-
There are hundreds to thousands of
backlogs in the VA system for patients needing care.
-
Pay for performance may affect smaller
hospitals since their ability to do certain procedures is limited
and tests are not available.
-
IT systems do not talk to each other,
which can be directly fixed with a mandate. The real reform will be
in the delivery of healthcare, but this will require increased
access and many more physicians.
[top]
[back
to e-card archive page] |
|
|
|
|
You have subscribed to this newsletter. If your
contact information has changed, please update
your account. Thank you!
|
|