May 17, 2010

TOA RSS News Feed

 

 

Subcommittee On Health Care: Imaging Services

 

TOA President L. Edward Seade, MDBy L. Edward Seade, MD
President, Texas Orthopaedic Association

Last Monday, the Texas House Appropriations Subcommittee on Health & Human Services held a hearing asking invited shareholders for their input to help identify factors influencing health care cost trends in Texas, including practices or policies that may contribute to regional variations. Testimony was heard regarding policy changes to promote best practices, reduce costs, and improve quality within the state Medicaid program, Employees Retirement System, and Teacher Retirement System. An issue under particular investigation is medical imaging utilization and its impact on the cost and quality of health
care. The letter below served as official written testimony from your Association. The Texas Orthopaedic Association is working to see that our patients obtain quality care and sensible medical imaging services.

TOA is an active member of the Imaging Alliance along with Texas Chapter of Cardiology, Texas Ophthalmological Association, Texas Neurological Society, Texas Urological Association, Texas Society of Gastroentrology and Endoscopy, Texas Association of Obstretricians and Gynecologist, as well as the Texas Society of Neurological Surgeons and the Texas Physician Hospital Advocacy Center. The Imaging Alliance is a transparent coalition made up of physicians, medical societies, patients' rights groups, and concerned individuals who support physicians practicing direct patient care and who are advocates for responsible utilization of diagnostic imaging services in Texas.

TOA and the Alliance support the Texas Medical Association's official policy that responsible ownership, whether by physicians or hospitals, should be patient-centered and include a commitment to appropriate peer review of utilization, quality, and safety to ensure the highest quality of care for our patients. We also support new and innovative ways to improve patient convenience and access to care, as well as ongoing education of physicians on the appropriate utilization of imaging services, based on peer reviewed medical literature.

 


TOA Letterhead

May 10, 2010

TO:  Texas Appropriations Committee: Subcommittee on Health & Human Services

As an organization representing over 1500 orthopaedic surgeons practicing in the State of Texas, the Texas Orthopaedic Association (TOA) strongly believes by the virtue of their education, training and experience, orthopaedic surgeons are highly qualified to perform or supervise the performance of the diagnostic imaging studies that are a necessary and integral part of orthopaedic care.

Orthopaedic surgeons in training daily interpret basic and advanced musculoskeletal images in order to make diagnoses and therapeutic recommendations. The certification testing for the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery requires interpretation of imaging studies on 50% of the Part I questions, 100% of the Part II questions, and 50% of the questions at Re-certification every ten years. Orthopaedic surgeons are the most qualified physicians to independently make clinical recommendations for musculoskeletal patients based upon their use of imaging studies.

The ability of the orthopaedist to correlate the image with the living anatomy also plays a critical role in the interpretation of CT or MRI studies. Not only are orthopaedic surgeons trained to interpret plain radiographs and other images in descriptive terms…they offer functional, anatomical, and clinical assessments, resulting in patient-specific information not typically available to or provided by a radiologist. It is the orthopaedic interpretation of the imaging studies, in concert with the history and physical examination that determines the course of treatment and carries with it the responsibility for optimal orthopaedic patient care.

Most orthopaedic imaging procedures are performed when the patient is in the orthopaedic office so that judgments can be made in a timely manner, without delay, at the time of clinical decision making.  Imaging procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons increase the quality of patient care and safety while reducing the costs of redundant imaging. 

If patients are required to leave the orthopaedic surgeon's office to obtain imaging studies at another facility, more than one visit may be required to assess the condition and make appropriate treatment decisions, especially if the outside facility is unfamiliar with the patient's condition. This will also place a significant burden on patients who are often poorly mobile, ill or elderly. In many cases, transport by family members or by ambulance service is required, especially if the outside facility is located blocks or miles away, thus adding to the ancillary costs.

Patient inconvenience is one consideration, however, in some instances patient care could be compromised if they are required to leave a controlled office environment to have radiographs done elsewhere. Under certain circumstances moving the patient could be dangerous, ill-advised, and places the patient at unnecessary risk.

Orthopaedic surgeons are required and are highly qualified to perform or to supervise the performance of musculoskeletal radiographic studies, and to interpret these studies.   The Texas Orthopaedic Association strongly believes that any other policy is likely to increase the cost of providing patient services, and adds a substantial risk to those patients requiring comprehensive management of fractures and other orthopaedic conditions and specialized positioning and handling in the radiographic suite.  All health care policy regarding the performance of diagnostic imaging needs to result in the optimal care of the orthopaedic patient.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Seade Signature 
L. Edward Seade, MD, President
Texas Orthopaedic Association 

Teuscher Signature
David Teuscher, MD
TOA Legislative Chair

For further information, please contact Rachel Reed at the Imaging Alliance.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]

Demystifying "Meaningful Use"

 

Greenway Medical logo

By the Greenway Medical Staff

 

Stated meaningful use goals of the HITECH Act within The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) mirror those of physician practices: early detection, prevention, and management of chronic diseases, for example.

 

Additional incentives seek to improve the coordination of care and information among hospitals, laboratories, and physician offices; improve healthcare quality, reduce medical errors, reduce health disparities, and advance the delivery of patient-centered medical care.

 

Getting there, specifically in terms of qualifying for up to $44,000 through Medicare and up to $63,750 through Medicaid pathways, paid per eligible professional within a practice of any size, is a matter of finding the pathway that best suits your practice, specialty and patient volume.

 

Now that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) are just a few months away from releasing final meaningful use criteria, with CMS covering physicians and ONC overseeing the functionality of electronic health records, it's still safe to consider the requirements as a meaningful use checklist for your practice and your existing or desired EHR.

 

The initial criteria established up to two dozen functionality standards each for providers and EHRs because overall, meaningful use is a two-part consideration. On one hand, certified EHRs must have the necessary functionality to support meaningful use. On the other, practices must show they are using the functionality in a meaningful way within proposed criteria to qualify for the appropriate incentives.

 

(That checklist of functionality, details on eligibility within the Medicare and Medicaid pathways and details of new certification criteria for EHR systems to be eligible to report meaningful use, can be found by clicking here.)

 

With the public comment phase of the original proposals having come to a close March 15, expect final regulations to subtract or limit some of the functionality criteria. By regulatory definition, and again based on public comment, do not expect any expansion of the CMS or ONC list of functionality requirements.

 

There's still plenty of time to qualify. Incentive funds for Medicaid providers are available as early as October 2010 and funds for Medicare providers are available as soon as January 2011. Providers are free to begin the process when they are ready. However, ARRA funds are only available through 2015.

 

Within the Medicare pathway, the initial criteria states that eligible professionals must only achieve meaningful use reporting for 90 continuous days to qualify in the first year. Therefore the provider can begin reporting meaningful use as late as October of 2011 and still qualify for the largest amount of initial funding. (Medicaid incentives can be subject to individual state plans in regards to timetables and is well worth checking.)

 

Also, on April 15 of this year, language from the original legislation was changed and signed into law which expands eligibility to eligible providers working in hospital-based outpatient settings. Originally, hospital-based outpatient practitioners were excluded from incentives. (Hospital-based inpatient and ED practitioners remain ineligible.)

 

The following care providers are currently eligible to receive Medicare stimulus funds; Doctor of Medicine or Osteopathy, Doctor of Dental Surgery or Dental Medicine, Doctor of Podiatric, Doctor of Optometry and Chiropractor (focus on Spinal Subluxation).

 

The Medicaid eligible professional definition includes the following; Physician, Dentist,

Certified Nurse Mid-wife, Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant (Rural Health Clinic/FQHC.

 

Overall, meaningful use criteria is a two-part consideration. On one hand, your certified EHR must have the necessary functionality to support meaningful use. On the other, practices must show they are using the functionality in a meaningful way within proposed criteria to qualify for the appropriate incentives.

 

The overall meaningful use criteria is proposed in three phases over time, with only phase one required in the first meaningful use year. Phase one emphasizes the ability of providers to collect data in electronic form, share key information with other providers and patients, and report quality measures through CPOE, for example.

 

Phases two and three of meaningful use coming after 2011 expand functionality to include disease management criteria and information exchange with government and public health agencies, when formulary checks, encounter progress notes, and automated lab results come into play. For example, an interoperable EHR should link clinical devices such as ECG or spirometry, or merge automated lab results into flow sheets on a system that maintains the values and integrity of the data for later retrieval.

 

The demystification comes into play when practices selecting an EHR find that 1) EHR software providers have been developing functionality and interoperability that adheres to previously known meaningful use criteria, and 2) that current certification has also been shaped to meaningful use standards.

 

Throughout your selection process, keep in mind that the CMS and ONC proposals do state that meaningful use is, "based on currently available technological capabilities and providers' practice experience," and that, "the standards adopted in the rules are consistent with current industry standards."

 

Also keep in mind your "meaningful use" EHR must be certified to qualify. The ONC is also scheduled to publish final requirements for certification bodies this summer. Systems currently certified by CCHIT, such as Greenway's PrimeSuite, are poised to qualify, because the certification was aligned with federal reporting criteria used as a basis for meaningful use. Other organizations are expected to also become certification bodies in the future.

 

And finally, it's important to realize that the stimulus EHR adoption incentives are grounded in law, not just regulation, meaning the funds will not go away.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]

Thank You To Our Sponsor: FlexRad

 

FlexRad banner
Click here to visit their website!

[top] [back to e-card archive page]

This Week In Texas: Mignon McGarry's Memos

 

TOA Legislative Advocate Mignon McGarryBy Mignon McGarry
TOA Legislative Advocate
TOA Online Version: All Memos

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

There will be a runoff in the special election to fill the remainder of former Sen. Kip Averitt's (R-Waco) term in Senate District 22.  Republicans David Sibley and Brian Birdwell will meet in a runoff to be held on a date to be set by Gov. Rick Perry.  Sibley led in the special election voting with 45 percent of the vote, followed by Birdwell, with 36.5 percent, Democrat Gayle Avant, with 13.3 percent, and Republican Darren Yancy, with 5.2 percent.  The winner of the runoff will serve until January.  Republican and Democratic Party county chairman from each of the counties in Senate District 22 will chose candidates to run for the seat in November.

 

House Appropriations Chairman Jim Pitts (R-Waxahachie) told members of his committee that he believes the budget shortfall facing the Texas Legislature next session is around $18 billion and could be even higher.  This new estimate tops the $15 billion figure quoted the past few months.  State sales tax revenues for the year are down 10.3 percent, or nearly $1.5 billion.  Look for budget writers to find creative ways of dealing with this situation.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]

Red Flag Enforcement Begins June 1, 2010

 

TOA LogoWill your practice be in compliance?  We thank AAOS and Marty Krawzyck for this article regarding this important June 1 deadline.

Last fall, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) delayed enforcement of the "Identity Theft Red Flag Rule" (the Rule) from August 1, 2009,
until June 1, 2010, to give industries and professionals - such as physicians and other healthcare providers - who were unaware of their responsibilities time to comply. That deadline is just days away, and compliance is mandatory. (The rule was originally intended to take effect on Nov. 1, 2008)

The Red Flag Regulations and Guidelines (§114 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, as amended in 2007) provides financial institutions and creditors with a framework for identifying patterns, practices, and specific forms of activity that indicate the possible existence of identity theft, defined as "a fraud committed or attempted using the identifying information of another without authority."

Challenges denied
Both medical associations and legal professionals have challenged the FTC, insisting that the Rule does not and should not apply to physicians and related healthcare providers. The challenges have focused on the following three issues:

  • Physicians are not creditors as defined by law.

  • Because healthcare providers are required to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), they should not be required to comply with the Rule.

  • Compliance would pose a burden to medical practices.

In February the FTC responded, maintaining its position that physicians and other healthcare providers are covered by the Rule. The agency contends that intent of the Rule is to address all forms of identity theft, including those related to healthcare services. Under the FTC guidelines, physicians are creditors if they regularly bill patients for services.

The FTC also states that the Rule generally complements, rather than duplicates, HIPAA data security requirements and is designed to ensure that medical practices are alert to signs that a patient may be using fraudulent information to obtain medical services.

The FTC also noted that the Rule is flexible and tailored to the potential degree of identity theft faced by the individual physician. This risk-based criteria determines the simplicity or complexity of a medical practice's individual written identity theft prevention program. For details on developing an identity theft prevention program for your practice, see "Identity theft: Could it happen in your office?", or search "Red Flag" on the online practice management center (www.aaos.org/pracman).

Why comply with the Rule?
Compliance is mandatory and under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the FTC can impose monetary penalties for noncompliance. Practices need to demonstrate a good faith effort to comply with the Rule as evidenced by the development of a written identity theft prevention program. The program can protect patients and the practice from the significant, harmful effects resulting from identity theft.

Marty Krawczyk is a practice management coordinator in the AAOS practice management group; she can be reached via email by clicking here.

References

  1. The full text of the Final Red Flag Rules, Section 114 of the Fair and Accurate Transactions Act (FACTA)

  2. Consumer Identification Programs for Financial Transactions

  3. Red Flag and Address Discrepancy Requirements: Suggestions for Health Care Providers. The World Privacy Forum (September 24, 2008)

Click here to read Protect your patients, protect your practice: What you need to know about the Red Flags Rule.

Click here to read the instructions for completing the ID theft affidavit along with the ID theft affidavit.

[top] [back to e-card archive page]

You have subscribed to this newsletter.  If your contact information has changed, please update your account.  Thank you!